[sheepdog] [PATCH v4 2/2] collie: add a new option --progress to "node recovery" for showing recovery progress

[Hitoshi Mitake]

At Fri, 2 Aug 2013 23:43:09 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 11:14:23PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > From: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi at lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > 
> > This patch adds a new option --progress (or -P) to the node recovery
> > subcommand. With this subcommand, users can show a progress of
> > recovery process.
> > 
> > Example:
> > $ sudo collie node recovery --progress
> >  99.7 % [==============================================>] 7047 / 7068
> > 
> > The denominator (7068 in the above case) indicates a number of entire
> > object which should be checked. The numerator (7047 in the above case)
> > indicates a number of objects which is already checked or copied.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi at lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > ---
> > v4:
> >  - refactor the loop of get_recovery_state()
> > 
> > v3:
> >  - make struct recovery_state a general mechanism for getting recovery
> >    status. Ordinal "collie node recovery" uses struct recovery_state
> >    for detecting recovery state instead of a result of request.
> > 
> > v2:
> >  - don't use new variables for indicating the progress
> >  - clean coding style
> >  -- change names of struct recovery_info's members
> >  -- fill_recovery_progress() -> get_recovery_progress()
> > 
> >  collie/node.c |   89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/collie/node.c b/collie/node.c
> > index 4230af5..eed6a39 100644
> > --- a/collie/node.c
> > +++ b/collie/node.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >  
> >  static struct node_cmd_data {
> >  	bool all_nodes;
> > +	bool recovery_progress;
> >  } node_cmd_data;
> >  
> >  static void cal_total_vdi_size(uint32_t vid, const char *name, const char *tag,
> > @@ -120,10 +121,90 @@ static int node_info(int argc, char **argv)
> >  	return EXIT_SUCCESS;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int get_recovery_state(struct recovery_state *state)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	struct sd_req req;
> > +
> > +	sd_init_req(&req, SD_OP_STAT_RECOVERY);
> > +	req.data_length = sizeof(*state);
> > +
> > +	ret = collie_exec_req(sdhost, sdport, &req, state);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		fprintf(stderr, "Failed to execute request\n");
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int node_recovery_progress(void)
> > +{
> > +	int result;
> > +	struct recovery_state rstate;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * ToDos
> > +	 *
> > +	 * 1. Calculate size of actually copied objects.
> > +	 *    For doing this, not so trivial changes for recovery process are
> > +	 *    required.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * 2. Print remaining physical time.
> > +	 *    Even if it is not so acculate, the information is helpful for
> > +	 *    administrators.
> > +	 */
> > +
> > +	result = get_recovery_state(&rstate);
> > +	if (result < 0)
> > +		return EXIT_SYSFAIL;
> > +
> > +	if (!rstate.in_recovery)
> > +		return EXIT_SUCCESS;
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		result = get_recovery_state(&rstate);
> > +		if (result < 0)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		if (!rstate.in_recovery) {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * not an immediate completion, we already called
> > +			 * get_recovery_state() before this loop
> 
> This comment is useless.

OK, let's remove it.

> 
> > +			 */
> > +			show_progress(rstate.nr_total, rstate.nr_total, true);
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> 
> if recovery finishes, chances are that nr_total is 0 (all nodes finishes recoveries)
> , no?

Thanks for your pointing. This is my mistake. Saving previous nr_total
and use it for 100% progress would be better.

Thanks,
Hitoshi