[sheepdog] [PATCH] dog: vdi checking for lost inode objects

[Liu Yuan]

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:54:02PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> Current "dog vdi check" cannot work well in a case of inode object
> lost. This patch lets the subcommand handle the case correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake.hitoshi at lab.ntt.co.jp>

Why we need this patch? what did this patch try to fix? If we remove one inode
object, current 'vdi check' can fix it without any problem. no?

Thanks
Yuan