[sheepdog] [PATCH 2/3] event: add deferred event register/unregister mechanism

Liu Yuan namei.unix at gmail.com
Thu Jan 16 15:06:18 CET 2014


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:58:35PM +0900, MORITA Kazutaka wrote:
> At Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:32:42 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> > 
> > Since current code works well, do we really need to introduce prioritized event
> > loop which need some overhead of sorting events?
> > 
> > For now with this patch set, the only benefit is that it looks more 'beautiful'
> > that we have complete reg/unreg for worker threads, which isn't must for making
> > code correct nor run faster.
> > 
> > The downside is obvious, that 1) reg/unreg in worker is worsen a bit 2) event loop
> > is affected negatively by sorting overhead. We don't get pratical benefits.
> > 
> > I want to get other developer's opinion.
> 
> To be honest, I don't like both.
> 
> The current code assumes that register_event() must be called by at
> most one thread.  However, we don't do any check about it in
> register_event().  I don't think Hitoshi's approach is a good one,
> too.  It adds many codes and complexity.
> 
> Do we really need exec_local_req_async() and the short event
> framework?  The use case of exec_local_req_async() is:
> 
>     iocb = local_req_init();
> 
>     loop:
>         ...
>         exec_local_req_async(req, iocb);
>         ...
> 
>     ret = local_req_wait(iocb);
> 
> However, we can do the similar thing with a work queue:
> 
>     wq = create_work_queue();
> 
>     loop:
>         ...
>         work.fn = do_work;
>         work.done = do_main;
>         queue_work(wq, &work);
>         ...
> 
>     while (nr--) {
>         eventfd_read(efd);
>     }
> 
> ...
> 
>     void do_work()
>     {
>         exec_local_req(req);
>     }
> 
>     void do_main()
>     {
>         eventfd_write(efd);
>     }
> 
> 
> If we can move forward without introducing an additional framework
> like a short event, it looks much better way to me.
> 

Looks feasible to me (looks the same as that in object cache), but can you
provide the complete patch? I hope we can get a nice API to do async request
without touching low level work queue and eventfd stuff.

Thanks
Yuan



More information about the sheepdog mailing list