[sheepdog] Users inputs for new reclaim algorithm, please
    MORITA Kazutaka 
    morita.kazutaka at gmail.com
       
    Mon Mar 17 23:19:49 CET 2014
    
    
  
At Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:02:18 +0800,
Liu Yuan wrote:
> 
> Keep old algorithm is a bottom line to me. Either sheep option or static #ifdef
> looks fine to me. We can later refine it to be dynamically pluggable.
> 
> New algorithm looks to me more a partial solution than a generic one, compared
> with old algorithm. So keep old algorithm really make sense especially to those
> who seldom delete snapshots.
Why partial?  The updated snapshot-object-reclaim branch fixes the
problem you mentioned, and the new algorithm frees more spaces than
the old one even with your example scenario.
Thanks,
Kazutaka
    
    
More information about the sheepdog
mailing list