[sheepdog] A radical rethinking on struct vdi_state

Liu Yuan namei.unix at gmail.com
Mon May 18 03:28:02 CEST 2015

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:31:47PM +0300, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> Per volume redundancy useful for hostings or openstack based solutions. So
> users may need to pay for stability or increase speed..
> 14 мая 2015 г. 13:21 пользователь "Valerio Pachera" <sirio81 at gmail.com>
> написал:
> > IMHO, per volume redundancy, is something I never felt the need for.

Per volume redundancy might be useful for a huge cluster with 10000+ nodes,
which serve a larger quantity of people with different requirements. But for
now, serveral small sized clusters ( < 100) would be recommended to build a
large data center, each equiped with different settings for different use.


More information about the sheepdog mailing list