[Stgt-devel] [PATCH] iscsi fix xmit param
FUJITA Tomonori
tomof
Sat Aug 18 07:10:56 CEST 2007
From: Pete Wyckoff <pw at osc.edu>
Subject: Re: [Stgt-devel] [PATCH] iscsi fix xmit param
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:15:59 -0500
> tomof at acm.org wrote on Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:11 +0900:
> > On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:52:06 -0500
> > Pete Wyckoff <pw at osc.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > This might be a hack. In fixing the defaults earlier, I put the
> > > SCSI default for MaxRecvDataSegmentLength in place for the
> > > ISCSI_PARAM_MAX_XMIT_DLENGTH. But really it should be whatever
> > > the initiator tells us.
> >
> > Not sure. Initiators can declarer whatever about MRDSL, the target can
> > use a lower value than it. And the target administrator should be able
> > to configure it.
> >
> > That's the current behaivoir (taken from IET).
>
> True. There are a few cases.
>
> 1. ini sends mrdsl > target mxdsl. Apply minimum, use target max.
> 2. ini sends mrdsl < target mxdsl. Apply minimum, use ini max.
> 3. ini does not mention mrdsl. Target should set its mxdsl to the
> standard default (8192), not use its default max.
>
> This last case was broken before my earlier patch "iscsi param
> cleanup". Now it is fixed but I changed the target default to 8k.
> I want the target to agree to use a larger value if the initiator is
> willing, but still get case #3 correct if the initiator does not
> specify.
Really?
I think that if ini does not mention mrdsl and target doesn't use the
standard default mxdsl value (a target admin sets non default value),
text_check_param() sets xmdsl to the default value.
More information about the stgt
mailing list