[Stgt-devel] [Patch 1/2] Add-new-module-entry-points-for-configuration - Try 5
Tue Jun 5 14:49:58 CEST 2007
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 10:11 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> nice patches so far.
> But as we now have the ability to configure the LUN dynamically, why
> can't we move the 'type' definition down from the target to the LUN, too?
> It still strikes me as odd that the _target_ has a type; strictly
> speaking it's the _LUN_ which has a specific type, not the target.
> So I'd prefer to move the type definition into the LUN.
make sense. actually in iet we suggested to have this lun type for quite
a long time.
> I actually have a patch here; I see that I can reformat it on top of
> your two patches.
More information about the stgt