[Stgt-devel] Performance of SCST versus STGT
Bart Van Assche
Tue Jan 22 08:50:03 CET 2008
On Jan 22, 2008 4:26 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> First, I recommend you to examine iSER stuff more since it has some
> parameters unlike SRP, which effects the performance, IIRC. At least,
> you could get the iSER performances similar to Pete's.
Documentation about configuring iSER parameters at the initiator side
appears to be hard to find. A Google query for (iscsiadm "op update"
"v iser" -- http://www.google.com/search?q=iscsiadm+%22op+update%22+%22v+iser%22)
gave only one result:
http://www.mail-archive.com/stgt-devel at lists.berlios.de/msg00033.html.
I also found an update of this document:
http://www.mail-archive.com/stgt-devel at lists.berlios.de/msg00133.html.
Are you referring to parameters like MaxRecvDataSegmentLength,
TargetRecvDataSegmentLength, InitiatorRecvDataSegmentLength and
MaxOutstandingUnexpectedPDUs as explained in RFC 5046
It would be interesting for me to know which values Pete had
configured in his tests, such that I can configure the same values for
More information about the stgt