[stgt] [Scst-devel] [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO)

Vladislav Bolkhovitin vst at vlnb.net
Tue Apr 14 20:10:06 CEST 2009

Tomasz Chmielewski, on 04/14/2009 03:07 PM wrote:
> Vladislav Bolkhovitin schrieb:
>>> Could anyone recheck if it's the same on some other system?
>>>> Which IO scheduler on the target did you use? I guess, deadline? If 
>>>> so, you should try with CFQ as well.
>>> I used CFQ.
>> You didn't apply io_context-XXX.patch, correct? With it you should see a 
>>  noticeable increase, like in http://scst.sourceforge.net/vl_res.txt.
> I didn't apply this one.
> I used 2.6.26.x kernel and io_context-XXX.patch was for 2.6.27, 2.6.28 
> and 2.6.29 only; 2.6.27 fails to apply to kernel (perhaps in a 
> trivial way, I didn't check).

Yes, io_context patch for 2.6.26.x kernels doesn't exist, because it 
isn't clear if it has the necessary functionality.

But it's worth for you to upgrade to 2.6.27.x. Have you seen 

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

More information about the stgt mailing list