[stgt] [PATCH RFC] support multiple target instances

ronnie sahlberg ronniesahlberg at gmail.com
Fri Sep 25 03:07:23 CEST 2009

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:09 AM, FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:07:24 +0300
> Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz at Voltaire.com> wrote:
>> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> > I know that but it doesn't sound good to me. How can you handle isns_port?
>> > tgtd --port=3260 --iscsi=isns-port=1000
>> > tgtd --iscsi=iscsi-port=3260,isns-port=1000
>> > The latter looks more consistent to me.
>> I am fine with both approaches
> Everyone, other opinions?

I think it would make more sense to separate the port specified for
the mgmt channel from the iscsi related ports.
since it may be desireable to also run multiple instances of tgtd for
fcoe as well and then --iscsi-port would not make sense.

So I think it would be better with
--port=1234  --iscsi=iscsi-port=3260,isns-port=1000

Or even better :
--port=1234  --iscsi-portal= --iscsi-port=3260 --isns-port=1000

Where --port only refers to the mgmt socket, which is unique for each
instance of tgtd.

ronnie sahlberg
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

More information about the stgt mailing list