[stgt] [PATCH RFC] support multiple target instances

[ronnie sahlberg]

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:24 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:07:23 +1000
> ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:09 AM, FUJITA Tomonori
>> <fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:07:24 +0300
>> > Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz at Voltaire.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> >> > I know that but it doesn't sound good to me. How can you handle isns_port?
>> >> > tgtd --port=3260 --iscsi=isns-port=1000
>> >> > tgtd --iscsi=iscsi-port=3260,isns-port=1000
>> >> > The latter looks more consistent to me.
>> >>
>> >> I am fine with both approaches
>> >
>> > Everyone, other opinions?
>> >
>>
>> I think it would make more sense to separate the port specified for
>> the mgmt channel from the iscsi related ports.
>> since it may be desireable to also run multiple instances of tgtd for
>> fcoe as well and then --iscsi-port would not make sense.
>
> Yeah, agreed. I don't fancy '--port' much though. It's a bit too
> generic. I prefer something like '--mport' (or '--manage-port').

Maybe use --socket
That is what I use in ctdb/ctdbd to override the default domain socket
to use to send mgmt commands to the daemon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html