[stgt] tgt-admin and a -C, --control-port argument

Steven Wertheimer steven.wertheimer at oracle.com
Tue Apr 27 06:56:34 CEST 2010


I just tried that change and it didn't affect the results in
any significant way.

Thanks

--
Steve

On 2010-04-22 18:14, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:06:26 -0700
> Steven Wertheimer<steven.wertheimer at oracle.com>  wrote:
>
>    
>> As I said, I have not instrumented tgtd, but it seems pretty clear that
>> one tgtd process becomes CPU-bound and is unable to do enough
>> local I/O to saturate all of the disks. I'm happy to instrument and re-run
>> if that would help.
>>      
> Can you get better numbers if you increase NR_WORKER_THREADS like
> this?
>
> diff --git a/usr/bs_thread.h b/usr/bs_thread.h
> index 9dfbbd5..3640da2 100644
> --- a/usr/bs_thread.h
> +++ b/usr/bs_thread.h
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -#define NR_WORKER_THREADS	4
> +#define NR_WORKER_THREADS	16
>
>   typedef void (request_func_t) (struct scsi_cmd *);
>
>
>
>    
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



More information about the stgt mailing list