[stgt] [PATCH RFC] support multiple target instances

[ronnie sahlberg]

Hi.

I changed it to --control-port and -C


regards
ronnie sahlberg


On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:50 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:29:18 +1100
> ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The part of the patch where we control the management channel seems to
>> have been lost/forgotten.
>>
>> Please find a patch attached that contains an updated version Or's
>> patch for specifying the management channel
>> to allow us to run multiple instances of tgtd concurrently.
>>
>> This can be useful in testing since on very powerful machines, the
>> single thread for the eventloop reaches 100% of one core, this caps
>> performance.
>
> adding specifying management port support is fine by me, as I said
> before, I don't fancy running multiple tgtd though.
>
> I have two comments:
>
> 1. We already have long options like "initiator-address" so I like
> clear long options. Something like 'management-port' or 'control-port'
> instead of 'mgmt-port'?
>
> 2. Is it better to have the same short option for tgtd and tgtadm?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Based-on-Or-Gerlitz-patch-from.patch.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 5026 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/stgt/attachments/20100226/6ea85137/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Based-on-Or-Gerlitz-patch-from.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 21728 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/stgt/attachments/20100226/6ea85137/attachment-0002.patch>