[stgt] tgtd segfault

[FUJITA Tomonori]

On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:59:38 +0300
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh at panasas.com> wrote:

> > Thanks, the pthread-per-target changes were reverted, so it should be
> > stable now. tgt had been stable before the changes. Otherwise, vendor
> > guys would hit me hard, I guess. :)
> 
> Hi Tomo
> 
> Do you have plans to return this in the future, once debugged and stabilised?

I want but probably it would take long. I need to work on the
clustering feature now because my company needs it.


> For me too, as osd-target. It gave performance boost with multiple targets on
> same machine. This is because my target is badly written and does sync handling,
> no queue, of every thing. Funny that I did not experience problems with it 
> during testing, but I'm not running a production system so I might got lucky.
> 
> Please tell me your plans so I know if I'll have to fix my backend, one day, or
> can get by with this fix.

I don't know when I can rework on this. I would recommend you to fix
your issues.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html