[stgt] [PATCH 0/4] tgt: Address issues with reservation preempt
lars at oddbit.com
Thu Oct 14 16:19:23 CEST 2010
> Hmm, then how can they live with NetApp?
I'm sure there are a number of NetApp customers that ask themselves
that question regularly.
It would be possible to re-implement the SCSI fencing script to use
preempt rather than preempt-abort, but I suspect the motivation for
prempt-abort is to prevent any outstanding i/o operations from
completing (because absent this, a successful preempt operation isn't
really equivalent to a fencing operation). I'm not sure what the real
risks are in this situation. Does anyone have any thoughts?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the stgt