[stgt] bs_rdwr_request

FUJITA Tomonori fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp
Mon Aug 27 08:51:47 CEST 2012


On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:42:02 +0300
Roi Dayan <roi.dayan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:39 AM, FUJITA Tomonori
> <fujita.tomonori at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:58:02 +0300
> > Roi Dayan <roi.dayan at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Roi Dayan <roi.dayan at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:06 PM, <frederik.vos at linvirt.nl> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I tested also version 1.0.28: no problem
> >> >> version 1.0.29: no problem
> >> >> version 1.0.30: there is the problem
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I tested as well with ESXi 5.1 and I could not login with ESXi as initiator
> >> > The error from tgtd was as follows:
> >> >
> >> > tgtd: add_mode_page(1648) Mode Page 10 (0x01): param_count 6 != MODE
> >> > PAGE size : 31
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I checked for commits between 1.0.29 - 1.0.30 that modify or call this
> >> > function and found
> >> > that commit 9a95b4431ccc01b82cb4febc735485cd06cd5ea4 added a new call
> >> > to add_mode_page()
> >> > and the error is the result of that new call:
> >> >
> >> > 518     +  /* Control Extensions mode page:  TCMOS:1 */
> >> > 519     +  add_mode_page(lu, "0x0a:1:0x1c:0x04:0x00:0x00");
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > After removing this call ESXi logged in fine and without any problems.
> >> >
> >> > frederik,
> >> > mind trying it as well?
> >
> > I guess that it's due to compare-and-write command but I might be
> > wrong.
> >
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The failure is because add_mode_page expect size of data according to
> the size specified in the page string
> i.e. for the call: add_mode_page(lu, "0x0a:1:0x1c:0x04:0x00:0x00");
> the size is 0x1c (28) and the data count is 3 (0x04 0x00:0x00) so
> add_mode_page fails.
> 
> The patch I sent accepts it and it means rest of the bytes in the page
> data will be 0 because of how the page is allocated.

Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation.


> Do you still want a patch to update the callers instead?

No. Your patch sounds ok. Ronnie, any opinion?

But I don't think that your patch fixes Frederik's problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



More information about the stgt mailing list