[stgt] Why LUN0?

Boaz Harrosh bharrosh at panasas.com
Mon Dec 10 17:22:50 CET 2012

On 12/10/2012 06:06 PM, Braun, David wrote:
> My --force patch (I'll submit it if you want) didn't exist until a few weeks ago.

I forgot to say.

I think the real (proper) solution is that at time of "tgtadm of Target" 
we should not open up sockets and/or do anything. We should only allocate the
structures and be in a "not-initialized" state.

Then at tgtadm of LUN0 we will only then open-up network sockets and do all
it does now at "tgtadm of target".

So there is *no* more issues of targets without LUNs and all are happy.

I never had time to code it because my current patch was just fine for
my system, so it was never a priority.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

More information about the stgt mailing list