[wpkg-users] Basic Question

Falko Trojahn nospam_ft at smi-softmark.de
Fri Sep 5 10:30:10 CEST 2008


Hi,

> Regarding the "dots on revision", AFAIK revision should always be an
> integer, not a decimal or string. So I'd leave periods out of the revision
> value.
>

Wpkg supports doted revision numbers since Version 1.0, as Rainer Meier
stated here:
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120#c1

But it seems there are revision numbers supported with 2 dots, not with 3:
2.4.0.1 is recognised as 2.4.0 as was tested here:
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120#c2

But I'd anyway use revision numbers without dots, too.

Regards,
Falko


-- 
Falko Trojahn                     fon +49-341-3581294
Dipl-Ingenieur Netzwerke/Support  fax +49-341-3581295

SMI Softmark Informationstechnologien GmbH
Sitz: D-04416 Markkleeberg, Friedrich-Ebert-Str. 51
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 164
Geschäftsführer: Andreas Griesmann




More information about the wpkg-users mailing list