[sheepdog-users] Fwd: dog vdi check: ovject is incosistent

[Micha Kersloot]

Hi,

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Valerio Pachera" <sirio81 at gmail.com>
> To: "Lista sheepdog user" <sheepdog-users at lists.wpkg.org>
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 8:06:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [sheepdog-users] Fwd: dog vdi check: ovject is incosistent
> 
> 2014-10-09 17:26 GMT+02:00 Micha Kersloot <micha at kovoks.nl>:
> > 2014-10-06 15:18:50     26 [10.10.0.21:7000, 10.10.0.22:7000,
> > 10.10.0.30:7000]
> > 2014-10-06 15:18:32     25 [10.10.0.21:7000, 10.10.0.30:7000]
> > 2014-10-06 15:07:04     24 [10.10.0.21:7000, 10.10.0.22:7000,
> > 10.10.0.30:7000]
> > 2014-10-06 15:05:16     23 [10.10.0.21:7000, 10.10.0.30:7000]
> > ...
> 
> It's clear that you have never remove more than a single devise so
> corruption should not happen (if the guest was not running).
> 
> I may try to replicate.

I hope it is just my current use case. But you say the guest shouldn't be running, but why is that important? I tried to mimic a host failure, there was a guest running on 10.10.0.30 while I pulled the plug on 10.10.0.22. There where no guests running on 10.10.0.22 and 10.10.0.21.

I'm currently converting the vdi to copies=3 instead of copies=2:1 and I'll do the same tests.

Thanks and greets,

Micha Kersloot

KovoKs B.V.