[sheepdog-users] 答复: 答复: Help? Creeping Errors "no inode has ..." with 0.9.1

[redtone]

Thanks for Hitoshi's confirmation 

Is the new algorithm of VID recycling  compatible with the v 0.9.1? 


At Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:19:37 +0800,
redtone wrote:
> 
> [1  <multipart/related (7bit)>]
> [1.1  <multipart/alternative (7bit)>]
> [1.1.1  <text/plain; gb2312 (quoted-printable)>]
> Please make sure the recycle VDI is disabled for v 0.9.1
> 
>  
> 
> Daily snapshot will remove the old snapshot and create a new one.
> 
> If recycle VDI is enabled, when the snapshot is removed, the assigned VDI
> will be deleted. And so the data is lost. 
> 
>  
> 
> This bug is fixed in v 0.7.1. but I am not sure in v 0.9.1.

The bug is already solved in v0.9.x. So Thronton's problem isn't
related to it.

# BTW, the master branch has correct algorithm of VID recycling

Thanks,
Hitoshi

> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> $A7"$B7o?M(B: sheepdog-users [mailto:sheepdog-users-bounces at lists.wpkg.
org] $BBeI=(B
> Thornton Prime
> $A7"$BAw$AJ1<d(B: 2015$BG/(B1$B7n(B27$BF|(B 23:50
> $BZ at 7o?M(B: Hitoshi Mitake
> $B>6Aw(B: Lista sheepdog user
> $B<g$ALb(B: Re: [sheepdog-users] Help? Creeping Errors "no inode has
..." with
> 0.9.1
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks. I have been using cache -- so if that is unstable that would
explain
> a lot. I'm disabling cache to see how much that helps.
> 
> Attached is a dog cluster info. I have a few MB of logs ... I'll see where
I
> can post them to get the
> 
> I am seeing a strong correlation between snapshots and the corrupted VDIs.
> All the VDIs that have missing inodes are part of a daily snapshot
schedule.
> All the VDIs that are not part of the snapshot schedule are fine. All the
> nodes have object cache enabled.
> 
> Thanks ... I'll see if I can collect more data and reproduce the problem
> more consistently.
> 
> ~ thornton prime
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  <mailto:mitake.hitoshi at lab.ntt.co.jp> Hitoshi Mitake
> 
> January 26, 2015 at 8:17 PM
> 
> At Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:11:29 -0800,
> Thornton Prime wrote:
> 
> I've been getting increasing errors in my logs that "failed No object
> found, remote address: XXXXXXX:7000, op name: READ_PEER" and then
> corresponding errors that "no inode has ...." when I do a cluster check.
> 
>  
> Could you provide detailed logs and an output of "dog cluster info"?
>  
> 
> At the beginning of last week I had no errors, and over the course of a
> week it grew to be one VDI missing some hundred inodes, and now it is
> multiple VDIs each missing hundreds of objects.
>  
> I haven't seen any issues with the underlying hardware, disks, or
> zookeeper on the nodes in the course of the same time.
>  
> What is causing this data loss? How can I debug it? How can I stem it?
> Any chances I can repair the missing inodes?
>  
> I have 5 sheepdog storage nodes, also running Zookeeper. I have another
> 8 "gateway only" nodes that are part of the node pool, but only running
> a gateway and cache.
> 
>  
> Object cache (a functionality which can be activated with -w option of
> sheep) is quite unstable. Please do not use it for serious purpose.
>  
> Thanks,
> Hitoshi
> 
> 
> 
>  <mailto:thornton.prime at gmail.com> Thornton Prime
> 
> January 26, 2015 at 7:11 AM
> 
> I've been getting increasing errors in my logs that "failed No object
> found, remote address: XXXXXXX:7000, op name: READ_PEER" and then
> corresponding errors that "no inode has ...." when I do a cluster check.
> 
> At the beginning of last week I had no errors, and over the course of a
> week it grew to be one VDI missing some hundred inodes, and now it is
> multiple VDIs each missing hundreds of objects.
> 
> I haven't seen any issues with the underlying hardware, disks, or
> zookeeper on the nodes in the course of the same time.
> 
> What is causing this data loss? How can I debug it? How can I stem it?
> Any chances I can repair the missing inodes?
> 
> I have 5 sheepdog storage nodes, also running Zookeeper. I have another
> 8 "gateway only" nodes that are part of the node pool, but only running
> a gateway and cache.
> 
> I have about dozen VDI images, and they've been fairly static for the
> last week while I've been testing -- not a lot of write activity.
> 
> ~ thornton
> 
> [1.1.2  <text/html; gb2312 (quoted-printable)>]
> 
> [2  <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> -- 
> sheepdog-users mailing lists
> sheepdog-users at lists.wpkg.org
> https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog-users