On 06/04/2012 04:53 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > One possibility is that if forward_write_obj_req() fails before > receiving data, the next forward_(read|write)_obj_req() could be > interleaved. > > The below untested patch may fix the problem though the approach is a > poor way. Well, from the log: Jun 04 10:16:37 do_gateway_request(288) 2, 80d6d76e00000000 , 1 Jun 04 10:16:37 do_gateway_request(308) failed: 2, 80d6d76e00000000 , 1, 54014b01 It is a read request, which is supposed to be handled to object cache layer, and should object_cache_pull(), then calls forward_read_obj_req(), which failed (maybe this is why we didn't get any log about it). Note, there were two requests to 80d6d76e00000000 meanwhile. Thanks, Yuan |