On 06/04/2012 08:06 PM, Liu Yuan wrote: > On 06/04/2012 06:00 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Actually, I have since long been thinking of a *reverse* recovery > process: nodes scan its back-end store and actively send copy to > targeted nodes that need to recovery this copy. This would be much more > scalable and efficient. > Also, the nodes can actively tries to recovery the copy (not only passively wait for other nodes to send copies) when there is a pending requests for it. Thanks, Yuan |