On 06/25/2012 03:24 PM, Liu Yuan wrote: > On 06/23/2012 09:40 PM, Yunkai Zhang wrote: >> When EPOLLERR/EPOLLHUP events occur, other events(eg: EPOLLIN) may be >> inclued at the same time, but we should priority to process them as the >> connection was destroyed. > > Applied this series. > This whole series need revisiting: 1) cause performance degradation, because it forces concurrent requests from QEMU to be serialized 2) Deadlock explained in patch 'sheep: take truns to monitor EPOLLIN and EPOLLOUT events.' is questionable. I don't see a deadlock by code review. Thanks Yuan |