On 06/28/2012 12:24 PM, Liu Yuan wrote: > On 06/25/2012 03:24 PM, Liu Yuan wrote: >> On 06/23/2012 09:40 PM, Yunkai Zhang wrote: >>> When EPOLLERR/EPOLLHUP events occur, other events(eg: EPOLLIN) may be >>> inclued at the same time, but we should priority to process them as the >>> connection was destroyed. >> >> Applied this series. >> > > This whole series need revisiting: > > 1) cause performance degradation, because it forces concurrent requests > from QEMU to be serialized > 2) Deadlock explained in patch 'sheep: take truns to monitor EPOLLIN and > EPOLLOUT events.' is questionable. I don't see a deadlock by code review. > Revert 3/4 and 4/4 Thanks, Yuan |