[sheepdog] [sheepdog-users] Stability problems with kvm using a remote sheepdog volume
David Douard
david.douard at gmail.com
Sat Jun 9 15:43:48 CEST 2012
On 09/06/2012 12:39, David Douard wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 16:48, MORITA Kazutaka wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:41 PM, David Douard <david.douard at logilab.fr> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I still have very serious stability problems with kvm when using remote
>>> sheepdog access.
>>>
>>> I filles a bug on github about this:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/collie/sheepdog/issues/26
>>>
>>> Are there any other people having similar problems? What can I do to
>>> identify the problem and try to fix it?
>> Hi David,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> I'm working on fixing a race condition in the qemu sheepdog block driver.
>> I guess you are hitting the same problem. I've pushed some half baked fixes to
>> git://github.com/kazum/qemu.git
>>
>> Can you try this tree?
> I will.
I am currently testing it. For now, the results are very encouraging. No
segfault for now, while running bonnie++ and pgbench tests.
If the fix is validated by reviewers, it **must** be included in current
kvm packages for precise and squeeze-backports. I'll try to advocate for
this to be done as quick as possible (on the debian side).
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kazutaka
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog/attachments/20120609/56d19f89/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the sheepdog
mailing list