[sheepdog] [PATCH] sheep: fix oid scheduling in recovery

[Liu Yuan]

On 06/05/2012 07:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> I completely agree with your opinion there - if you look at old list
> archives you'll see that I argued against adding them to qemu but lost
> the fight.  There has been some recent discussion where people advocated
> for moving away from it again, though.


That is too bad. Anyway, dunno for now, if the coroutine is the only
choice for block driver implementation of QEMU? If yes, probably we
should go back to the QEMU version without it for the sake of code
maintainability.

>From the last development experience of vhost_blk that was invovled with
QEMU, I don't know why people there are running the fever of introducing
non-c construct like coroutine and QOM, whereas leave code untouched for
inefficiency of IO performance. Anyway, I won't complaint about it again.

Thanks,
Yuan