[sheepdog] [PATCH] sheep: stop special casing local objects on gateways

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 06:52:16PM +0800, Liu Yuan wrote:
> At your convenience :) Maybe two (small cluster and bigger one) would
> suffice. With cached FD pool, we might not lose that much performance
> for a quick thought, though, but this is quite radical change of design,
> numbers will definitely help it in. Kazum, how do you think of this change?

What do you define as a small cluster?  I would expect to see
substancial differences with a three node cluster, but then again I
would advice people to not even think about sheepdog for a setup that
small.

I'd say performance numbers only start to really matter for 20,30+
nodes, or does anyone disagree?