[sheepdog] [PATCH 1/3] sheep: fix a bug that read_object() fail in recovery
Liu Yuan
namei.unix at gmail.com
Mon Jun 25 13:10:44 CEST 2012
On 06/25/2012 07:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Is there any good reason to use networking to talk to the local node
> instead of directly queueing it up on the workqueue?
>
> Also is there any good reason to not treat write and remove requests
> the same way? If there is a good reason to do that it should probably
> be added to the code as a comment to explain the asymetric
> implementation.
His new version of the patch set does the direct queuing as I suggested.
But probably Levin should prefix the new version with [PATCH v2] to make
it obvious.
http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/sheepdog/2012-June/004740.html
Thanks,
Yuan
More information about the sheepdog
mailing list