On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 04:34:42PM +0800, Liu Yuan wrote: > On 05/17/2012 04:14 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Assuming some arguments come from sys while the epoch is passed is a bad > > convention. In addition the next patch will add a caller that doesn't > > take the nodes array from sys. > > > Seems that all the caller of update_epoch_log() pass sys->xxx, so how > about refactor it as update_epoch_log(void) ? This will change in the next patch. |