At Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:34:25 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > > At Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:05:54 +0800, > Liu Yuan wrote: > > > > On 04/10/2013 03:51 PM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > > > I don't disagree with making journaling as a default feature. But it > > > seems that current journaling needs to be improved and debugged. I > > > believe removing -j option should be done after enough stabilizing. > > > > This process looks sens to me. I agree journaling need much debugging > > and improvement. So what do you think of 'improvement' to bring to > > journaling before we can apply it as default? > > I believe -j option can be removed after passing all tests with -j > option itself. Currently some tests fail with journaling. This > wouldn't take a long time, -j is a temporal thing. We can turn -j into the option to disable journaling after making it the default. Thanks, Kazutaka |