[sheepdog] [PATCH 2/3] tests: add -j option for testing with journaling

MORITA Kazutaka morita.kazutaka at lab.ntt.co.jp
Thu Apr 11 06:48:05 CEST 2013


At Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:34:25 +0900,
Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> 
> At Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:05:54 +0800,
> Liu Yuan wrote:
> > 
> > On 04/10/2013 03:51 PM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> > > I don't disagree with making journaling as a default feature. But it
> > > seems that current journaling needs to be improved and debugged. I
> > > believe removing -j option should be done after enough stabilizing.
> > 
> > This process looks sens to me. I agree journaling need much debugging
> > and improvement. So what do you think of 'improvement' to bring to
> > journaling before we can apply it as default?
> 
> I believe -j option can be removed after passing all tests with -j
> option itself. Currently some tests fail with journaling. This
> wouldn't take a long time, -j is a temporal thing.

We can turn -j into the option to disable journaling after making it
the default.

Thanks,

Kazutaka


More information about the sheepdog mailing list