On 04/11/2013 12:48 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > Hitoshi Mitake wrote: >> > >> > At Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:05:54 +0800, >> > Liu Yuan wrote: >>> > > >>> > > On 04/10/2013 03:51 PM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: >>>> > > > I don't disagree with making journaling as a default feature. But it >>>> > > > seems that current journaling needs to be improved and debugged. I >>>> > > > believe removing -j option should be done after enough stabilizing. >>> > > >>> > > This process looks sens to me. I agree journaling need much debugging >>> > > and improvement. So what do you think of 'improvement' to bring to >>> > > journaling before we can apply it as default? >> > >> > I believe -j option can be removed after passing all tests with -j >> > option itself. Currently some tests fail with journaling. This >> > wouldn't take a long time, -j is a temporal thing. > We can turn -j into the option to disable journaling after making it > the default. Then it is better to keep this patch as local patch on your own to assist debugging. After we pass all the tests, then -j can be used to disable journaling as well as other options. Thanks, Yuan |