[sheepdog] [Sheepdog]Openstack support sheepdog matters?

[MORITA Kazutaka]

At Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:03:36 +0800,
harryxiyou wrote:
> > When I did the work, Cinder project didn't exist.  I added a sheepdog
> > driver to nova-volume, which was a block service of nova.  The daemon
> > was separated as Cinder project, so my code was also moved to Cinder.
> >
> > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/cinder/api/cinder.volume.drivers.sheepdog.html
> >
> But the changes you have made on openstack are now in Nova branch or
> Cinder branch?

In the Cinder branch.

https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/master/cinder/volume/drivers/sheepdog.py

> If the changes are really like
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~morita-kazutaka/nova/sheepdog/changes ?

I think so.

> These commit logs are so ealier. In the moment, how i can see all the diffs
> in the latest openstack source codes?

The code hasn't changed so much, and sheepdog driver is only 103
lines.  I think it's easier to see all the code. :)

> 
> >>
> [...]
> >
> > Sheepdog has only preliminary support for iSCSI.  All the IO requests
> > are processed synchronously.  If performance does not matter, you can
> > use it.
> >
> 
> You mean Sheepdog have not support for ISCSI or have support for ISCSI
> with synchronous IO requests?

I meant the latter.

Thanks,

Kazutaka