[sheepdog] [PATCH RFC] add support of sheepdog backing store
Dan Mick
dan.mick at inktank.com
Fri Sep 27 03:59:36 CEST 2013
>> Some might say this had better to be a dynamic loadable
>> library. Either is fine by me because it doesn't depend on any
>> original C header files.
>
> I'm ccing people who would be interested in modular backing
> stores, Ronnie Sahlberg and Andy Grover. I think the sheepdog backing
> store support doesn't have to be a module because it doesn't create
> any new dependencies. Any comments?
It seems that you've accomplished this by including structure and
constant definitions (and presumably protocol-marshalling routines) in
the tgt source file itself, which seems to me to be the wrong way to do
it, but it does free you from requiring headers or libraries, so
technically speaking, true.
I wouldn't write the plugin this way (copying code), but that's me.
More information about the sheepdog
mailing list