Hi Stefan. On 16.10.2011 16:43, Stefan Pendl wrote: > Thanks for fixing, will test in a few minutes. Great, there have been many fixes and improvements recently which need a bit more in-depth testing I guess. The change log for version 1.2.1 clearly shows that it's much more than just bugfixing. > <OT> > TSVN 1.7.0 is really nice and the release notes at http://tortoisesvn.net/tsvn_1.7_releasenotes.html tell you about the migration. > It did not last long for my project, but I only migrated the WC on a testing system. > Will go into production with TSVN 1.7.1 ;-) I did, still don't like all the crap. VCS have to be simple and stable. Blowing up the database (which happened in our company a couple of times already) is not what I call "stable". Within 12 years using CVS we did never have any broken file and even if it would the files are easy to retrieve and repair. A broken SVN database on the other side is PITA and FSFS storage was at no means a better choice. Disk space overhead and more complex metadata storage in databases instead of flat files does not add to simplicity as well. Migrating just the WPKG repositories on my memory stick took about 10 minutes (yes, it's not the fastest one). And I think it will be fun to do this with my > 1GB repositories in my company (and there's not just one). .. but we can version-control directories, what a killer-feature ;) I think Linus was right, developers shall not have to spend more time on mastering versioning systems than on programming code. > </OT> Now back to the fun parts: Testing some neat WPKG features :) br, Rainer |