[wpkg-users] Strict depend/chain checks or conflicts on 1.3.1?
Marco Gaiarin
gaio at sv.lnf.it
Mon Jun 23 12:12:48 CEST 2014
Mandi! Carlos R. Pasqualini
In chel di` si favelave...
> My thought was that include is like depends but with an explicit time
> definition 'after' the current package; for be more speciffic on this y
> put a depends on libreoffice-help, and libreoffice-help is not included
> in any profile, so it can only be called from libreoffice.
Probably i've used 'chain' for some (old?) WPKG behaviour, but i
rememeber well a past discussion on that topic that lead on 'better use
chain that include for that'.
Also, probably 'that' was not libreoffice. ;-)
Now, reading your comment and reading again:
http://wpkg.org/Package_dependencies
and considering that there's no strict ''dependencies'' between LO and
the help package, the better approach seems also to me using 'include',
eventually playing a bit with priority to force a package install
before/after the other (as you done).
Right? Thanks.
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.sv.lnf.it/
Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN)
marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t +39-0434-842711 f +39-0434-842797
Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA!
http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/chi_siamo/5xmille.php
(cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)
More information about the wpkg-users
mailing list