[wpkg-users] Strict depend/chain checks or conflicts on 1.3.1?

Marco Gaiarin gaio at sv.lnf.it
Mon Jun 23 12:12:48 CEST 2014


Mandi! Carlos R. Pasqualini
  In chel di` si favelave...

> My thought was that include is like depends but with an explicit time
> definition 'after' the current package; for be more speciffic on this y
> put a depends on libreoffice-help, and libreoffice-help is not included
> in any profile, so it can only be called from libreoffice.

Probably i've used 'chain' for some (old?) WPKG behaviour, but i
rememeber well a past discussion on that topic that lead on 'better use
chain that include for that'.
Also, probably 'that' was not libreoffice. ;-)


Now, reading your comment and reading again:
	http://wpkg.org/Package_dependencies

and considering that there's no strict ''dependencies'' between LO and
the help package, the better approach seems also to me using 'include',
eventually playing a bit with priority to force a package install
before/after the other (as you done).


Right? Thanks.

-- 
dott. Marco Gaiarin				        GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
  Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia''                    http://www.sv.lnf.it/
  Polo FVG   -   Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078   -   San Vito al Tagliamento (PN)
  marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it   t +39-0434-842711   f +39-0434-842797

		Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA!
	   http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/chi_siamo/5xmille.php
	(cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)



More information about the wpkg-users mailing list