[sheepdog-users] [ANNOUNCE] Sheepdog v0.9.0 releace candidate 0
Andrew J. Hobbs
ajhobbs at desu.edu
Fri Oct 24 16:17:35 CEST 2014
Doing a side-by-side install should work with a couple of potential
gotchas. One, you'd have to ensure separate ports are used -p 7001 for
example. Two, you'd have to use a separate zookeeper service for the
new cluster. Assuming you had those covered, you could probably then use
qemu-img to directly convert between the two running services. This may
end up being what I do as I can't really afford the outage of dumping
all of my images, then reloading them.
While I'd love to try 0.9, for us it'll wait until final or 0.9.1.
Which is a shame as I've had some issues with trying erasure encoded
images in 0.8.3.
On 10/24/2014 04:33 AM, Micha Kersloot wrote:
> I think it is the idea to export the vdi's, update/grade sheepdog and import the vdi's again?
> As I have a large part of my storage assigned to sheepdog, I pobably need to export my vdi's to the same filesystem that sheepdog is using, for example in a subdirectory. Is that possible or will sheepdog delete the whole filesystem it is assigned?
> Another procedure could be to install the 0.9 version next to the 0.8 version on the same machine with a different subdirectory on the already assigned filesystem and convert the vdi's one by one from the 0.8 cluster to the 0.9 cluster. Is this something I should look into (and document) or are there some structural things in sheepdog that would make this procedure impossible at all? First question on this: Could I use the same zookeeper cluster I'm already using for the 0.8 sheepdog cluster?
> Met vriendelijke groet,
> Micha Kersloot
> Blijf op de hoogte en ontvang de laatste tips over Zimbra/KovoKs Contact:
> KovoKs B.V. is ingeschreven onder KvK nummer: 11033334
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Hitoshi Mitake" <mitake.hitoshi at lab.ntt.co.jp>
>> To: "Andrew J. Hobbs" <ajhobbs at desu.edu>
>> Cc: sheepdog-users at lists.wpkg.org
>> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 9:31:51 AM
>> Subject: Re: [sheepdog-users] [ANNOUNCE] Sheepdog v0.9.0 releace candidate 0
>> At Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:47:28 +0000,
>> Andrew J. Hobbs wrote:
>>> [1 <text/plain; Windows-1252 (quoted-printable)>]
>>> Is 0.9.0 series compatible with 0.8 series for in place upgrades, or is
>>> it an all or nothing situation?
>> Sorry for my late reply. As Valerio replied, 0.9.x will not be
>> compatible with 0.8.x because of fundamental changes. In place upgrade
>> is not provided. Sorry for inconvenience :(
>>> On 10/07/2014 09:34 AM, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Hitoshi Mitake
>>>> <mitake.hitoshi at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>>> Hi sheepdog users and developers,
>>>>> I'd like to announce the release candidate 0 of sheepdog v0.9.0:
>>>>> Any kind of testing would be highly appreciated. Sheepdog 0.9.0 is
>>>>> planed to be released one week later:
>>>> Release is delayed because of the two below bugs:
>>>> - sheep cannot rotate log with deiban's default log rotation mechanism
>>>> - recovery process of EC sometimes corrupt data
>>>> After fixing them, I'll release rc1.
>>> [2 ajhobbs.vcf <text/x-vcard (base64)>]
>>> fn:Andrew J. Hobbs
>>> org:Delaware State University;Computer and Information Sciences
>>> adr:;;1200 N Dupont Hwy;Dover;DE;19901;USA
>>> email;internet:ajhobbs at desu.edu
>>> title:Lab Coordinator/System Administrator
>>> [3 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
>>> sheepdog-users mailing lists
>>> sheepdog-users at lists.wpkg.org
>> sheepdog-users mailing lists
>> sheepdog-users at lists.wpkg.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 353 bytes
More information about the sheepdog-users