[stgt] [PATCH] Modular backends version 3

Dan Mick dan.mick at inktank.com
Tue Aug 27 21:16:26 CEST 2013

On 08/26/2013 05:03 PM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
> You mean you prefer the previous version of the patch always builds
> tgtd with modular backends ?
> If so, that is fine with me. I just thought there was some pushback on
> that approach so I did this patch as a compromise.

I didn't see the pushback and so was surprised at this latest revision, 
and was hoping whoever had that opinion would join in.  But my opinion 
is that "bs modules always dynamic" is the right answer; I think you had 
it right in the prior version.

> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Dan Mick <dan.mick at inktank.com> wrote:
>> I think this is a bad idea; this will encourage package builders to build a
>> version which cannot be updated/new backends supplied, which removes a lot
>> of the advantage of building with .so backends to begin with.  Why are we
>> abandoning dynamic-by-default?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

More information about the stgt mailing list