[stgt] [PATCH] Modular backends version 3

ronnie sahlberg ronniesahlberg at gmail.com
Tue Aug 27 23:05:38 CEST 2013

Ok, I agree.

List, Tomo,   please ignore this patch and review/apply version 2 instead.

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Dan Mick <dan.mick at inktank.com> wrote:
> On 08/26/2013 05:03 PM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
>> You mean you prefer the previous version of the patch always builds
>> tgtd with modular backends ?
>> If so, that is fine with me. I just thought there was some pushback on
>> that approach so I did this patch as a compromise.
> I didn't see the pushback and so was surprised at this latest revision, and
> was hoping whoever had that opinion would join in.  But my opinion is that
> "bs modules always dynamic" is the right answer; I think you had it right in
> the prior version.
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Dan Mick <dan.mick at inktank.com> wrote:
>>> I think this is a bad idea; this will encourage package builders to build
>>> a
>>> version which cannot be updated/new backends supplied, which removes a
>>> lot
>>> of the advantage of building with .so backends to begin with.  Why are we
>>> abandoning dynamic-by-default?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

More information about the stgt mailing list